Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Извадка на типични случаи× | Избор на отклоняващи се случаи× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Методология на проучванията | Методология на проучванията |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) | 1990 |
| Създател | Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Тип | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Основополагащ източник | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Други названия | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Свързани | 5 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|