Сравнение на методи

	Stemmatic Textual Criticism	Variant Collation and CBGM
Област	Religious Studies	Religious Studies
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	1958	2004
Създател	Karl Lachmann (codified by Paul Maas; refined by M. L. West)	Gerd Mink (Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung, Münster)
Тип	Genealogical pipeline for reconstructing a lost archetype from manuscript witnesses	Coherence-based pipeline for genealogy in contaminated traditions
Основополагащ източник	Maas, P. (1958). Textual Criticism (trans. B. Flower). Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198143185	Mink, G. (2004). Problems of a highly contaminated tradition: the New Testament. Stemmata of variants as a source of a genealogy for witnesses. In P. van Reenen, A. den Hollander, & M. van Mulken (Eds.), Studies in Stemmatology II (pp. 13-85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 9789027232229
Други названия	Lachmannian Method, Recensionism, Genealogical Textual Criticism, Stemmatics	Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, CBGM, Apparatus Criticus Construction, Genealogical Coherence Analysis
Свързани	4	4
Резюме	Stemmatic textual criticism, the method codified by Karl Lachmann and given its classic formulation by Paul Maas in 1958, reconstructs the lost original of a work transmitted in many handwritten copies. Because every act of copying introduces errors, manuscripts that descend from a common defective ancestor share those errors. Maas's insight is that shared errors, not shared correct readings, reveal genealogy: by grouping witnesses according to the significant errors they hold in common, the critic builds a stemma codicum, a family tree of manuscripts rooted in the archetype. M. L. West's 1973 handbook turned these principles into working editorial practice for Greek and Latin texts, including the scriptures transmitted in those languages. The pipeline runs from collation through error analysis to a reconstructed archetype that can be defended reading by reading.	Variant collation and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM), developed by Gerd Mink at the Institute for New Testament Textual Research in Münster, address the central obstacle to editing the Greek New Testament: contamination. Because medieval scribes routinely copied from several exemplars at once, the New Testament tradition is too intermixed for a classical bifurcating stemma. Mink's solution, set out in his 2004 chapter in Studies in Stemmatology II, shifts the unit of analysis from whole manuscripts to individual variation passages. At each passage the editor decides which reading gave rise to which (a local stemma), and the method then aggregates these local decisions, using the coherence of agreement among witnesses, to infer the global flow of text and the relationships among witnesses. CBGM now underlies the Editio Critica Maior and the modern Nestle-Aland and UBS Greek New Testaments.