Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Пространствен модел на маргинална структура× | Пространствено съвпадение на пропенсити скор (Spatial Propensity Score Matching)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2000s |
| Създател≠ | Robins, Hernan & Brumback (MSM foundation, 2000); spatial extensions developed in spatial epidemiology literature | Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward |
| Тип≠ | Causal inference / spatial weighting | Quasi-experimental matching estimator |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | Spatial MSM, Geospatial MSM, Spatial IPW-MSM, Space-time marginal structural model | Spatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | The Spatial Marginal Structural Model (Spatial MSM) extends the classical marginal structural model to settings where units are geographically distributed and spatial dependencies — such as neighborhood spillovers, clustering, and spatial confounding — may bias causal estimates. It estimates causal effects of spatially varying exposures by constructing inverse probability weights that account for both individual covariates and spatial location, then fitting a weighted outcome model in the resulting pseudo-population. | Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|