Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Разработване на кратка форма на скала× | Конфирматорният факторен анализ (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1969 |
| Създател≠ | Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Scale development methodology | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Свързани≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|