Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Кратка номологична валидност× | Конфирматорният факторен анализ (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1969 |
| Създател≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Validity assessment technique | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|