Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research× | Методи за съпоставяне (CEM / оптимално / генетично)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1983–2002 | 2012 |
| Създател≠ | Paul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and others | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching) |
| Тип≠ | Causal robustness / bias assessment | Matching for causal inference |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studies | coarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings. | Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|