ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Проучване Фаза IV с коригиран риск×Съгласуване по показател на склонност×
ОбластЕпидемиологияСтатистика за изследвания
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1990s–2000s (formalized with ICH E2E and EMA PASS guidelines)1983
СъздателRegulatory and pharmacoepidemiology community (ICH, EMA, FDA frameworks)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипObservational / quasi-experimental clinical study designMethod
Основополагащ източникStrom, B. L. (Ed.). (2005). Pharmacoepidemiology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0470863107Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Други названияrisk-adjusted post-marketing surveillance study, adjusted Phase IV trial, risk-stratified post-authorization study, PASS with risk adjustmentPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Свързани33
РезюмеA risk-adjusted Phase IV study is an observational or semi-experimental post-marketing study conducted after a drug or device has received regulatory approval. It uses statistical risk-adjustment techniques — such as propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or multivariable regression — to control for confounding by indication and baseline patient differences, thereby producing more credible safety, effectiveness, and utilization estimates than unadjusted real-world analyses.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Risk-adjusted Phase IV study · Propensity Score Matching. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare