ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Ретроспективно клинично проучване Фаза II×Дизайн на изследване за диагностична точност×
ОбластЕпидемиологияКлинични изследвания
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1980s–1990s (with growth in oncology retrospective analyses)2003-2015
СъздателAdapted from standard Phase II trial methodology; retrospective variant formalized in oncology practiceBossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
ТипObservational retrospective studyResearch Design
Основополагащ източникSimon, R. (1989). Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(1), 1–10. DOI ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
Други названияretrospective Phase II study, historical Phase II analysis, retrospective efficacy study, Phase II retrospective analysisdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
Свързани52
РезюмеA retrospective Phase II clinical trial evaluates a treatment's preliminary efficacy and safety signals using existing archival data — medical records, registries, or electronic health records — rather than prospectively enrolling new patients. It mirrors the objectives of a standard Phase II trial (estimating response rate, tolerability, and early efficacy) but does so by looking backward at patients who have already received the intervention, making it faster and less costly than a prospective design.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Retrospective phase II clinical trial · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare