Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Дневник на изследването× | Метод на дневника× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Методология на проучванията | Методология на проучванията |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology | 1920s–1940s (systematised by Allport, 1942) |
| Създател≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) | Gordon Allport (systematic social-science use); Nels Anderson (early fieldwork diaries) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative / mixed-methods data-collection technique |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ | Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761941415 |
| Други названия | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary | diary study, diary technique, self-report diary, daily diary method |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. | The diary method is a data-collection technique in which participants record their thoughts, behaviours, events, or experiences in their own words at regular or event-contingent intervals over a defined study period. By capturing data close in time to the event, diaries reduce retrospective recall bias and give researchers access to the texture of everyday life as it unfolds — something one-off surveys and retrospective interviews cannot provide. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|