Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Рефлексивност в качествените изследвания× | Метод на задълбочено интервю× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени изследвания | Качествени изследвания |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1990 | 1954 |
| Създател≠ | Anthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu | Carl Rogers and Herbert H. Hyman |
| Тип≠ | Concept | Method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗ | Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631 |
| Други названия | reflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice | IDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewing |
| Свързани≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted. | In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|