ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Randomized Response Technique×Expert Survey×
ОбластPolitical SciencePolitical Science
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1965
СъздателStanley L. WarnerComparative party-positioning research (Castles & Mair; Chapel Hill team)
ТипSensitive-question survey techniqueSurvey of subject-matter experts to measure latent positions
Основополагащ източникWarner, S. L. (1965). Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63–69. DOI ↗Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. DOI ↗
Други названияRRT, Randomized response, Warner's randomized response, Forced-response techniqueExpert judgment survey, Party expert survey, Chapel Hill Expert Survey, Expert placement survey
Свързани34
РезюмеThe randomized response technique (RRT) is a survey method for asking about sensitive or stigmatized topics while guaranteeing each respondent's privacy. Introduced by Stanley Warner in 1965, it uses a randomizing device — a coin, die, or spinner — to determine, privately and unknown to the interviewer, whether the respondent answers the sensitive question or an alternative. Because the analyst knows only the probability distribution of the device and not the outcome for any individual, no answer can be traced to a particular question, yet the population prevalence of the sensitive trait can be recovered exactly by inverting the known randomization.An expert survey measures latent political quantities — most often parties' positions on policy dimensions — by asking a panel of country and subject-matter experts to place the objects of interest on structured numerical scales. Averaging many experts' judgments yields position estimates, while the spread across experts provides a built-in measure of uncertainty and reliability. The Chapel Hill Expert Survey is the leading example, producing comparable measures of European parties' positions on ideology, European integration, and many specific issues over time.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Randomized Response Technique · Expert Survey. Извлечено на 2026-06-25 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare