Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Двупропорционален z-тест× | Тест със знаци× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Статистика | Статистика |
| Семейство | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1900 | 1946 |
| Създател≠ | Karl Pearson / classical large-sample z approximation | W. J. Dixon & A. M. Mood |
| Тип≠ | Parametric proportion comparison | Nonparametric median test |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. DOI ↗ | Dixon, W. J. & Mood, A. M. (1946). The statistical sign test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41(236), 557–566. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | z-test for proportions, two-sample proportion test, one-proportion z-test, Oran Testi — z Testi (Oranlar) | İşaret Testi (Sign Test), one-sample sign test, paired sign test |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | The proportion test (z-test for proportions) is a parametric hypothesis test that compares one or two sample proportions against a reference value or each other. Grounded in the large-sample normal approximation formalized by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (2003), it is the standard tool for binary outcome comparisons when samples are large enough for the central limit theorem to apply. | The sign test is the simplest nonparametric hypothesis test for deciding whether the median of paired differences — or of a single sample — differs significantly from a hypothesised value. Formalised by W. J. Dixon and A. M. Mood in 1946, it imposes virtually no distributional assumptions and can be applied to any data where individual differences can be classified as positive or negative. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|