Сравнение на методи

	Участваща устна история	Устна история
Област	Качествени методи	Качествени методи
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	1970s–1990s (formalized participatory dimension by 1990)	1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology
Създател	Michael Frisch (shared authority concept); broader roots in Alessandro Portelli and oral history movement	Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork
Тип	Qualitative participatory research design	Qualitative research method
Основополагащ източник	Frisch, M. (1990). A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791402481	Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957
Други названия	community oral history, collaborative oral history, participatory memory research, POH	life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research
Свързани	5	6
Резюме	Participatory oral history is a qualitative research design in which community members act as co-researchers alongside academic investigators to collect, interpret, and share first-person accounts of lived experience and collective memory. Drawing on Michael Frisch's concept of 'shared authority,' it repositions research participants as active agents in the knowledge-production process rather than passive informants, making it especially powerful for documenting marginalized voices and community-held histories that would otherwise remain invisible in official archives.	Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected.