Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Участие в биографични изследвания× | Устна история× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Създател≠ | Intersection of biographical methods tradition (Denzin, Chamberlayne) and participatory action research (Lewin, Reason & Bradbury) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415196659 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Други названия | collaborative biography, participatory life history, co-constructed biographical inquiry, PBR | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Participatory Biographical Research (PBR) combines the in-depth life-story tradition of biographical methods with the collaborative ethos of participatory inquiry. Participants are not merely sources of data; they are active co-researchers who help design questions, interpret their own narratives, and validate emerging findings. The result is a richly layered account of individual lives that is jointly owned by both researcher and participant. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|