Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Outcome Harvesting× | Developmental Evaluation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2012 | 2011 |
| Създател≠ | Ricardo Wilson-Grau & Heather Britt | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Тип≠ | Retrospective, outcome-led evaluation approach | Complexity-informed evaluation approach for innovation |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Wilson-Grau, R., & Britt, H. (2012). Outcome Harvesting. Cairo: Ford Foundation MENA Office (revised November 2013). link ↗ | Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781606238721 |
| Други названия≠ | OH, Wilson-Grau Outcome Harvesting | DE, Patton Developmental Evaluation, Complexity-Informed Evaluation |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Outcome Harvesting is a participatory evaluation approach, developed by Ricardo Wilson-Grau and Heather Britt, that identifies outcomes after they have occurred and then works backward to determine whether and how an intervention contributed to them. Instead of measuring progress against predefined targets, evaluators 'harvest' evidence of observable changes in the behaviour, relationships, actions or policies of social actors, then assess the program's contribution to each. It is designed for complex settings where cause-and-effect relationships are not fully understood in advance and outcomes cannot be specified ahead of time. | Developmental evaluation is an approach designed to support innovation and adaptation in complex, dynamic environments where the intervention itself is still emerging. Articulated by Michael Quinn Patton in his 2011 book, it abandons the assumption of a fixed, pre-specified model to be tested, and instead embeds an evaluator within the design team to provide real-time feedback that informs ongoing development. Its purpose is development — helping social innovators learn, adapt and respond as conditions change — rather than the improvement of a settled program (formative) or the judgement of a completed one (summative). |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|