Сравнение на методи

	Подход на порядъковите приоритети	Аналитичен йерархичен процес	PROMETHEE II
Област	Вземане на решения	Вземане на решения	Вземане на решения
Семейство	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Година на възникване	1977	1980	1986
Създател	Ward Edwards and collaborators	Saaty, T. L.	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.
Тип	Ordinal ranking-based weight derivation	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Preference function (net flow)
Основополагащ източник	Edwards, W. (1977). Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney, & H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting objectives in decisions (pp. 247-307). Wiley.	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research
Други названия	OPA, Ordinal Priority	—	—
Свързани	4	8	8
Резюме	The Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) is a family of methods that derive criteria weights directly from ordinal rankings rather than cardinal (numerical) preferences. Instead of asking decision-makers to assign exact weight values or ratio comparisons, OPA asks only: which criterion is most important, which is second, etc. The method then converts this ordinal ranking into numerical weights using geometric or statistical formulas.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.