ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Подход на порядъковите приоритети×Аналитичен йерархичен процес×Метод "Най-добър-Най-лош"×ELECTRE I×PROMETHEE II×
ОбластВземане на решенияВземане на решенияВземане на решенияВземане на решенияВземане на решения
СемействоMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Година на възникване19771980201519681986
СъздателWard Edwards and collaboratorsSaaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Roy, B.Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.
ТипOrdinal ranking-based weight derivationPairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPConcordance–discordance (crisp outranking)Preference function (net flow)
Основополагащ източникEdwards, W. (1977). Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In D. E. Bell, R. L. Keeney, & H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting objectives in decisions (pp. 247-307). Wiley. link ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue Française d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle DOI ↗Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗
Други названияOPA, Ordinal Priority
Свързани48888
РезюмеThe Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) is a family of methods that derive criteria weights directly from ordinal rankings rather than cardinal (numerical) preferences. Instead of asking decision-makers to assign exact weight values or ratio comparisons, OPA asks only: which criterion is most important, which is second, etc. The method then converts this ordinal ranking into numerical weights using geometric or statistical formulas.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ELECTRE (ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Roy, B. in 1968. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Ordinal Priority Approach · AHP · BWM · ELECTRE · PROMETHEE. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare