Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Тестване за инвариантност на ординални измервания× | Конфирматорният факторен анализ (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1984–2011 | 1969 |
| Създател≠ | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Multi-group model comparison | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|