ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Number of Identified Specimens (NISP)×Zooarchaeological Quantification×
ОбластАрхеологияАрхеология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20082008
СъздателStandard zooarchaeological practice; statistical properties formalized by Donald Grayson and R. Lee LymanElizabeth Reitz & Elizabeth Wing (synthesis); R. Lee Lyman (critical formalization)
ТипPrimary observational tally of identified bone specimens per taxonSuite of quantitative measures of taxonomic and skeletal-part abundance in faunal assemblages
Основополагащ източникReitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521673938Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521673938
Други названияNISP, Identified Specimen Count, Faunal Fragment Count, Specimen TallyFaunal Quantification, Measures of Taxonomic Abundance, Faunal Abundance Estimation, Bone Quantification
Свързани23
РезюмеThe number of identified specimens, universally abbreviated NISP, is the most basic quantitative measure in zooarchaeology: a simple count of every bone or bone fragment that an analyst can identify to a taxon. It is the first number computed for almost any faunal assemblage because it is fast, transparent, additive across deposits, and reproducible. Yet, as Reitz and Wing emphasize and Lyman dissects in detail, NISP is an observation count rather than an animal count, and it is distorted by fragmentation, by recovery technique, and by the fact that fragments of a single bone are not independent of one another. Understanding precisely what NISP does and does not measure is the foundation on which all other faunal abundance estimates rest.Zooarchaeological quantification is the set of methods used to convert a pile of identified animal bones into estimates of how abundant each taxon and each body part was in a faunal assemblage. No single number does the job: the discipline relies on a family of complementary measures — the number of identified specimens (NISP), the minimum number of individuals (MNI), the minimum number of skeletal elements (MNE), the minimum animal units (MAU), and biomass estimates from allometric regression. Each captures a different facet of abundance and carries its own biases, so analysts compute several and interpret them against one another. The synthesis by Reitz and Wing codifies these measures for working zooarchaeologists, while Lyman's taphonomic treatment exposes how fragmentation, recovery, and density-mediated attrition distort every one of them.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Number of Identified Specimens (NISP) · Zooarchaeological Quantification. Извлечено на 2026-06-24 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare