Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Множествено базирано на случаи устноисторическо изследване× | Сравнителна устна история× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1970s–1990s (convergence of oral history and case study traditions) | 1970s–1990s (oral history discipline; comparative application developed through 1990s) |
| Създател≠ | Alessandro Portelli (oral history theory); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic) | Alessandro Portelli, Paul Thompson (oral history tradition); comparative design adapted from cross-cultural qualitative research |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative multi-case research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Portelli, A. (1997). The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN: 978-0299153045 | Portelli, A. (1991). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404997 |
| Други названия | multi-case oral history, comparative oral history, cross-case oral history, multi-site oral history | comparative oral history, cross-group oral history, comparative oral testimony, multi-site oral history |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Multiple case-based oral history is a qualitative research design that embeds oral history interviews within a multiple-case framework. Rather than collecting testimonies from a single community or site, the researcher deliberately selects two or more distinct cases — communities, cohorts, organisations, or geographic sites — gathers in-depth oral testimonies within each, and then conducts systematic cross-case comparison to identify both shared and divergent historical experiences. | Comparative oral history collects and systematically compares first-person spoken testimonies from two or more distinct groups, communities, or historical contexts. The method blends the interpretive depth of oral history — privileging personal memory and narrative — with the analytical logic of comparative design, enabling researchers to identify both shared patterns and meaningful differences across the groups under study. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|