ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Множествена автоетнография, базирана на казуси×Множествено казусно изследване×
ОбластКачествени методиКачествени методи
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване2000s–2010s1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
СъздателHeewon Chang, Faith Ngunjiri, Kathy-Ann Hernandez (collaborative autoethnography); broader tradition from Carolyn Ellis and Arthur BochnerRobert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
ТипQualitative research design variantQualitative research method
Основополагащ източникChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1611321104Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
Други названияcollective autoethnography, multi-case autoethnography, collaborative autoethnography, multi-site autoethnographycomparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
Свързани46
РезюмеMultiple case-based autoethnography is a qualitative design that extends autoethnographic inquiry across two or more researcher-participants or cases, enabling systematic comparison of personal lived experiences within a shared cultural or social phenomenon. By generating rich first-person narratives from each case and then conducting a structured cross-case analysis, the approach combines the depth and reflexivity of autoethnography with the comparative analytical power of multiple case design.Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Multiple case-based autoethnography · Multiple-Case Study. Извлечено на 2026-06-15 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare