Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Многонивова номологична валидност× | Конфирматорният факторен анализ (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2005 | 1969 |
| Създател≠ | Chen, Bliese & Mathieu (building on Cronbach & Meehl) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Chen, G., Bliese, P. D. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | cross-level construct validity, multilevel construct validation, MNV, nomological validity across levels | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Multilevel nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct and its network of theoretical relationships hold consistently across multiple levels of analysis — such as individual, team, and organization. It extends classical construct validation to nested data structures, ensuring that a measure means the same thing and behaves as theory predicts at each level. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|