Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Бележки от полеви наблюдения от множество източници× | Събиране на документи от множество източници× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Методология на проучванията | Методология на проучванията |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1970s–1990s (multi-observer extensions formalised in mixed-methods era) | 1970s–2000s (systematic articulation) |
| Създател≠ | Ethnographic research tradition; systematised by Emerson, Fretz & Shaw | Rooted in qualitative documentary traditions; codified in mixed-methods and triangulation literature (Denzin 1970s; Bowen 2009) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Data collection strategy |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206837 | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | multi-observer field notes, triangulated field notes, collaborative field notes, multi-site field notes | multi-source documentary research, multiple-document data collection, multi-site document analysis, cross-source document gathering |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Резюме≠ | Multi-source field notes is a data collection approach in which two or more observers, sites, or vantage points contribute written records of naturally occurring events, interactions, and settings. By pooling notes from multiple sources, researchers cross-check individual impressions and capture aspects of a scene that any single observer would miss, strengthening descriptive richness and analytical trustworthiness. | Multi-source document collection is a data-gathering strategy in which researchers systematically locate, retrieve, and compare documents drawn from two or more independent sources — such as government archives, institutional records, media outlets, organisational reports, or digital repositories. By assembling evidence from diverse provenance, researchers can triangulate findings, detect discrepancies, and build a richer, more credible picture of the phenomenon under study than any single documentary source can provide. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|