Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Многостепенно целенасочено извадково изследване× | Целенасочено подбиране× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Методология на проучванията | Методология на проучванията |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1980s–1990s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Създател≠ | Derived from Patton's purposive sampling framework; formalized in multi-site qualitative and mixed-methods research | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Тип | Non-probability sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Други названия | hierarchical purposive sampling, nested purposive sampling, multi-tier purposive sampling, multi-site purposive sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Свързани≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | Multi-level purposive sampling applies purposive selection criteria at two or more nested levels of a research hierarchy — for instance, first selecting sites or organizations, then selecting participants within each site. This layered approach allows researchers to align the theoretical logic of purposive sampling with the real-world structure of complex, hierarchical populations, making it especially valuable in multi-site qualitative studies and mixed-methods research. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|