ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Оценка на многогрупова дискриминантна валидност×Тестване на инвариантност на измерването при множество групи×
ОбластПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Година на възникване1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s1971–1993
СъздателFornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literatureJöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993)
ТипValidity assessment / model comparisonModel comparison / hypothesis testing
Основополагащ източникFornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
Други названияcross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groupsmeasurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing
Свързани56
РезюмеMulti-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Multi-group discriminant validity · Multi-group measurement invariance. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare