Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Въпросник за качеството на живот при сърдечна недостатъчност (MLHFQ)× | Въпросник за Кардиомиопатия в Канзас Сити (KCCQ)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Кардиология | Кардиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1987 | 2000 |
| Създател≠ | Timothy S. Rector | John A. Spertus |
| Тип | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: Content, reliability and responsiveness of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3(5), 198–209. link ↗ | Green, C. P., Porter, C. B., Bresnahan, D. R., & Spertus, J. A. (2000). Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health-related quality of life measure for heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(5), 1245–1253. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | MLHFQ | KCCQ |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a 21-item self-report measure that quantifies the multidimensional burden of heart failure on patients' daily living and quality of life. Developed by Rector, Kubo, and Cohn in 1987, the MLHFQ is the most widely used disease-specific QoL instrument in heart failure research and clinical practice, valued for its brevity, sensitivity to treatment response, and predictive value for prognosis. | The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, multidimensional self-report measure that evaluates heart failure-related symptoms, functional limitations, and quality of life in patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure of all severities. Developed by Spertus and colleagues in 2000, the KCCQ provides six disease-specific domains and a clinically summary score, making it ideal for comprehensive, domain-focused assessment in both clinical practice and research. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|