ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis×Alliance Network Analysis×
ОбластInternational RelationsInternational Relations
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване19962012
СъздателDaniel Jones, Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer (Correlates of War project)Skyler Cranmer, Bruce Desmarais & Elizabeth Menninga
ТипCoding and statistical analysis of interstate militarized confrontationsNetwork analysis and inferential network modeling of interstate alliances
Основополагащ източникJones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213. DOI ↗Cranmer, S. J., Desmarais, B. A., & Menninga, E. J. (2012). Complex dependencies in the alliance network. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3), 279–313. DOI ↗
Други названияMID Analysis, Militarized Dispute Coding, Correlates of War Dispute Analysis, Dyadic Conflict Onset AnalysisInternational Alliance Networks, Alliance Portfolio Network Analysis, Network Models of Alliance Formation, Interstate Alliance Graph Analysis
Свързани33
РезюмеMilitarized interstate dispute (MID) analysis is the coding and quantitative study of confrontations in which one state threatens, displays, or uses military force against another. Built on the Correlates of War project's MID dataset and the coding rules codified by Jones, Bremer, and Singer (1996), it provides the standard observational measure of interstate conflict short of and including war, structured as dyad-years so that the onset, escalation, and outcomes of disputes can be modeled statistically across two centuries of the international system.Alliance network analysis studies international alliances as a graph of states linked by formal security commitments, and models how that network forms and evolves. Rather than treating each alliance dyad as independent, it uses network science and inferential models such as the exponential random graph model (ERGM) — applied to alliance data by Cranmer, Desmarais, and Menninga (2012) — to capture the complex dependencies, such as a state's tendency to ally with its allies' allies, that ordinary dyadic regression assumes away.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis · Alliance Network Analysis. Извлечено на 2026-06-24 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare