Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Микро-усреднен F1× | Претеглена F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Оценка на модели | Оценка на модели |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Година на възникване | 2000s | 2000s |
| Създател | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Тип | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Основополагащ източник | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Support-weighted F1 |
| Свързани≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Резюме≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|