ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Мета-етнография×Обусловена теория×
ОбластНаукометрияКачествени изследвания
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване19881967
СъздателGeorge W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
ТипQualitative evidence synthesis methodMethod
Основополагащ източникNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Други названияqualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Свързани43
РезюмеMeta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Meta-ethnography · Grounded Theory. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare