Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Мачово рандомизирано клинично изпитване× | Прагматично рандомизирано контролирано проучване× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Епидемиология | Епидемиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | Mid-20th century concept; methodological formalization circa 2000–2010 | 1967 |
| Създател≠ | Developed formally in biostatistics literature; Greevy, Imai and colleagues advanced modern frameworks in the 2000s | Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch |
| Тип≠ | Experimental clinical study design | Interventional study design |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Imai, K., King, G., & Nall, C. (2009). The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. Statistical Science, 24(1), 29–53. DOI ↗ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | matched RCT, matched-pair randomized trial, matched randomized controlled trial, covariate-matched RCT | pragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | A matched randomized clinical trial pairs participants (or clusters) on key baseline characteristics before randomization, then allocates one member of each pair to treatment and the other to control. This design combines the causal validity of randomization with the covariate balance of matching, increasing statistical efficiency and reducing confounding from known prognostic variables without sacrificing the internal validity of a controlled experiment. | A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|