Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Съпоставен анализ на Каплан-Майер× | Анализ на Каплан-Майер× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Епидемиология | Епидемиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1958 (KM); matched application formalized 1980s–2000s | 1958 |
| Създател≠ | Kaplan & Meier (KM method, 1958); matching extensions developed through propensity score methods (Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983) | Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier |
| Тип≠ | Nonparametric survival analysis with observational confounder control | Nonparametric survival estimator |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457-481. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | KM analysis in matched cohorts, propensity-matched survival curves, matched survival analysis, paired Kaplan-Meier | KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Matched Kaplan-Meier analysis estimates and compares survival functions in groups that have been pre-balanced through individual or propensity-score matching. By applying the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator to matched cohorts or matched pairs, investigators can visualize time-to-event outcomes while controlling for confounders that would otherwise distort treatment or exposure comparisons in observational data. | Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|