ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Анализ на съвпадащи конкуриращи се рискове×Оценка на Каплан-Майер×
ОбластЕпидемиологияСтатистика
СемействоProcess / pipelineSurvival analysis
Година на възникване1999 (Fine-Gray model); extended to matched designs ~2010s1958
СъздателFine & Gray (subdistribution hazard model); Austin, Lee & Fine (matched competing risks framework)Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
ТипObservational survival analysis with matching and competing eventsNonparametric estimator
Основополагащ източникFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
Други названияmatched Fine-Gray analysis, propensity-matched competing risks, matched cause-specific hazard analysis, matched subdistribution hazard analysisKM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve, survival curve estimator
Свързани42
РезюмеMatched competing risks analysis combines subject-level matching (e.g., propensity-score matching) with competing risks survival methods to estimate the cause-specific or subdistribution hazard of an event of interest while accounting for competing events that preclude the occurrence of that event. It is widely used in clinical and epidemiological observational studies where patients may die from causes other than the primary outcome of interest, and where treatment groups differ on baseline confounders.The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function S(t) — the probability that an individual survives beyond time t — from data that include censored observations. Introduced by Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier in their landmark 1958 JASA paper, it is the standard first step in any survival analysis and is among the most-cited statistical methods in biomedical research.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Matched Competing Risks Analysis · Kaplan-Meier Estimator. Извлечено на 2026-06-17 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare