ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Машинно обучение-увеличено съвпадане по оценка на склонността×Съгласуване по показател на склонност×
ОбластПричинно-следствено заключениеСтатистика за изследвания
СемействоRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20041983
СъздателMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипCausal inference / matchingMethod
Основополагащ източникMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Други названияML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Свързани63
РезюмеMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare