Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Лонгитудинален метод на устната история× | Метод на устната история× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Полеви методи | Полеви методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1970s–1980s (systematic formulation); longstanding practice in oral history | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Създател≠ | Paul Thompson; developed further by Ken Plummer and oral history practitioners | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Thompson, P. (2000). The Voice of the Past: Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0192893468 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Други названия | repeated oral history interviewing, longitudinal life history, serial oral history, longitudinal biographical interviewing | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Свързани≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Longitudinal oral history method is a qualitative research design in which the same participants are interviewed repeatedly over an extended period — months or years — using oral history interviewing techniques. By returning to narrators across time, researchers can trace how personal accounts, identities, and interpretations of experience shift and evolve, capturing the processual and biographical dimensions of social life that a single interview cannot reveal. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|