Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Анализ на дискурса във времето× | Дискурсивен анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област≠ | Качествени методи | Качествени изследвания |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1990s–2000s (systematised as a distinct approach) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Създател≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jan Blommaert; applied linguists in sociolinguistics and CDA traditions | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415258937 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | LDA, diachronic discourse analysis, longitudinal CDA, discourse change analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Резюме≠ | Longitudinal Discourse Analysis (LDA) is a qualitative research approach that examines how discourse — language in use, texts, talk, and representational practices — changes across time. Rather than analysing a single snapshot of language, LDA collects and compares discourse data at multiple points to uncover how meanings, identities, ideologies, or social practices evolve, stabilise, or shift under the influence of historical, institutional, or societal forces. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|