Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Интерпретативна класическа обоснована теория× | Интерпретативна конструктивистка обоснована теория× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1967 (classic GT); interpretivist epistemological framing: mid-1990s onward | 2000–2006 |
| Създател≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); interpretivist framing elaborated by Merilyn Annells and others | Kathy Charmaz |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative theory-building method | Qualitative research design and analytic approach |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029140 |
| Други названия | interpretivist CGT, interpretivist classic GT, interpretive Glaserian grounded theory, interpretive emergent grounded theory | constructivist GT, interpretive CGT, Charmaz grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Interpretive classic grounded theory applies Glaser and Strauss's original discovery-oriented grounded theory procedures under an explicitly interpretivist epistemology. It retains classic GT's commitment to theory emergence — avoiding forced conceptual frameworks — while acknowledging that the researcher's interpretive lens shapes what is noticed and how meaning is constructed from data. This stance distinguishes it from purely objectivist readings of Glaser's later solo work and from constructivist grounded theory in its degree of inductive openness. | Interpretive constructivist grounded theory is a qualitative research design in which the researcher and participants are understood as jointly constructing meaning, and theory is built inductively from data through systematic comparative analysis. Developed by Kathy Charmaz as a departure from the positivist assumptions of classic grounded theory, this approach situates both the researcher and participants as active interpreters whose social positions, values, and interactions shape the categories and theory that emerge from the study. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|