ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Кроскултурен анализ на HRAF×Брой идентифицирани екземпляри×
ОбластАрхеологияАрхеология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване19671971
СъздателGeorge MurdockR. E. Chaplin
ТипEthnographic comparisonFaunal quantification method
Основополагащ източникMurdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗
Други названияcross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnographyNISP method, specimen count
Свързани24
РезюмеHRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: HRAF Cross-Cultural Analysis · Number of Identified Specimens. Извлечено на 2026-06-20 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare