ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Критерий за разрушение на Хук-Браун×Q-System×Оптимизация на разположението на откосите×
ОбластМинно делоМинно делоМинно дело
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване198019741960
СъздателEvert Hoek and E. T. BrownNick Barton (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute)Mining Engineering Practice
ТипEmpirical criterion for rock mass strength predictionEmpirical index for tunnel support and stability predictionOptimization framework for underground mine excavation design
Основополагащ източникHoek, E., & Brown, E. T. (2002). The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI: 2018 update. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(2), 445-463. link ↗Barton, N., Lien, R., & Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189-236. DOI ↗Brady, B. H. G., & Brown, E. T. (2004). Rock mechanics for underground mining. Springer Science+Business Media. link ↗
Други названияGeneralized Hoek-Brown Criterion, HB CriterionQ Index, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Classification, Barton SystemStope Design, Underground Mine Layout, Panel Design
Свързани333
РезюмеThe Hoek-Brown Criterion, developed by Evert Hoek and E. T. Brown starting in 1980, is an empirical failure criterion that predicts the shear strength of rock masses as a function of confining pressure. It accounts for rock quality (via the Geological Strength Index, GSI) and thus bridges laboratory rock mechanics and field behavior. The criterion is widely used in mining for slope stability, pillar design, and stress analysis.The Q-System (NGI Index), introduced by Nick Barton and colleagues at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in 1974, is an alternative rock mass classification to RMR. It combines six parameters into a dimensionless index Q ranging from 0.001 to 1000, where higher Q values indicate better rock quality. The Q-System is particularly valued for tunnel and underground excavation design due to its explicit consideration of joint roughness and groundwater effects.Stope layout optimization is the process of designing the size, shape, and spatial arrangement of underground mine excavations (stopes) to maximize ore recovery while maintaining safety and economic viability. It balances the desire for large extraction volumes against rock mechanics constraints and support costs. The layout determines mining productivity, capital investment in support systems, and long-term mine life.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Hoek-Brown Criterion · Q-System · Stope Layout. Извлечено на 2026-06-20 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare