ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Оценка на контрафактуалното въздействие с хетерогенни ефекти на третиране×Съгласуване по показател на склонност×
ОбластПричинно-следствено заключениеСтатистика за изследвания
СемействоRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване2010s1983
СъздателCerulli (2010) for CIE framework; Athey & Wager (2019) for causal forest-based CATE within CIEPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипQuasi-experimental causal inference with subgroup heterogeneityMethod
Основополагащ източникCerulli, G. (2010). Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record, 86(274), 421-449. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Други названияHTE-CIE, heterogeneous CIE, CATE-based counterfactual evaluation, subgroup counterfactual impact evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Свързани43
РезюмеHeterogeneous Treatment Effect Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (HTE-CIE) extends standard counterfactual impact evaluation by estimating how the causal effect of a policy or intervention varies across subgroups defined by pre-treatment characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it maps the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) across the covariate space, revealing who benefits most or least from an intervention.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Heterogeneous treatment effect Counterfactual impact evaluation · Propensity Score Matching. Извлечено на 2026-06-20 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare