Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Gender-Equitable Men Scale× | Modern Sexism Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Gender Studies | Gender Studies |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2008 | 1995 |
| Създател≠ | Julie Pulerwitz & Gary Barker | Janet K. Swim, Kathryn J. Aikin, Wayne S. Hall, and Barbara A. Hunter |
| Тип | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report attitude scale |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM Scale. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 322–338. DOI ↗ | Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | GEM Scale, Gender Equitable Men Scale, GEMS | MSS, Swim Modern Sexism Scale, Neosexism |
| Свързани | 4 | 4 |
| Резюме≠ | The Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale is a 24-item self-report instrument developed by Julie Pulerwitz and Gary Barker in 2008 to measure attitudes toward gender norms, particularly among men. Created and first validated with young men in Brazil through the Instituto Promundo programme, it covers norms around sexual and reproductive health, sexual relationships, violence, domestic work and child care, and homophobia, and has become a leading tool for evaluating gender-transformative health and violence-prevention interventions worldwide. | The Modern Sexism Scale, developed by Janet Swim and colleagues in 1995, distinguishes between old-fashioned (blatant) sexism and modern (subtle) sexism, paralleling work on old-fashioned versus modern racism. The accompanying Old-Fashioned Sexism Scale captures openly endorsed beliefs in women's inferiority and prescribed traditional roles, while the Modern Sexism Scale captures covert sexism expressed through denial of continuing discrimination, antagonism toward women's demands, and resentment of policies perceived as special favours. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|