Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Полева рефлексивна тематична анализ× | Рефлексивен тематичен анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2019–2021 (RTA formalised); field application concurrent | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| Създател≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (RTA foundation); applied to field settings via ethnographic traditions | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative analysis approach | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 9781473953932 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | field RTA, ethnographic reflexive thematic analysis, naturalistic RTA, field-based RTA | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| Свързани≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Field-based Reflexive Thematic Analysis (field RTA) integrates ethnographic data collection — participant observation, field notes, and naturalistic interviews — with the epistemologically explicit, researcher-centred analytic framework of Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis. It is used when themes must be grounded in observed social practice rather than retrospective accounts alone, placing the researcher's active, documented reflexivity at the centre of both data gathering and interpretation. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|