ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Полево-базиран интерпретативен феноменологичен анализ×Изследване на разкази в естествена среда×
ОбластКачествени методиКачествени методи
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1999–2009 (IPA seminal; field-based adaptation emerging 2000s–2010s)1990s–2000s
СъздателSmith, Flowers & Larkin (IPA); field extension drawn from ethnographic fieldwork traditionsD. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly
ТипQualitative research approachQualitative research design
Основополагащ източникSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943943
Други названияField IPA, Fieldwork IPA, Field-based IPA, Field-grounded interpretive phenomenologyfield narrative inquiry, naturalistic narrative inquiry, field-situated narrative research, in-situ narrative inquiry
Свързани56
РезюмеField-based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Field IPA) extends standard IPA by embedding data collection within naturalistic field settings. Rather than relying solely on retrospective interviews conducted away from the site of experience, the researcher enters the actual environment — a classroom, clinic, workplace, or community space — to gather field observations, artefacts, and in-context conversations alongside in-depth interviews. This produces a richer, more situated account of how participants make sense of their lived experience in the moment and place in which it unfolds.Field-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that investigates human experience by collecting and interpreting stories directly within the natural settings where those experiences unfold. Rooted in Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry framework, it moves the researcher into participants' lived worlds — classrooms, workplaces, communities — to gather rich field texts that preserve the contextual, temporal, and relational dimensions of experience through story.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Field-based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis · Field-based narrative inquiry. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare