ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Интервенционни смесени методи, фокусирани върху оценката×Оценка на програми×
ОбластДизайн на изследванетоПолеви методи
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване2000s (systematized ~2007–2011)1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
СъздателCreswell & Plano Clark (systematized); roots in evaluation research by Patton and ShadishMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
ТипMixed methods research designApplied evaluation methodology
Основополагащ източникCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483346298Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Други названияintervention mixed methods evaluation, mixed methods intervention evaluation, program evaluation mixed methods, evaluation mixed methodsevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Свързани23
РезюмеEvaluation-focused intervention mixed methods is a research design that embeds both quantitative and qualitative strands within an intervention or program evaluation study. It combines outcome measurement — typically from a randomized or quasi-experimental trial — with qualitative investigation of how and why the intervention worked, for whom, and under what conditions. The design is widely used in health, education, social service, and policy evaluation contexts where understanding mechanisms and context is as important as measuring effectiveness.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Evaluation-focused Intervention Mixed Methods · Program Evaluation. Извлечено на 2026-06-15 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare