Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Трансформативен дизайн със смесени методи с равно тегло× | Дизайн със смесени методи с приоритет на качествените изследвания× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Дизайн на изследването | Дизайн на изследването |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2003–2011 | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Създател≠ | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Тип | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Основополагащ източник | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Други названия | QUAN+QUAL transformative design, equal-priority transformative MMR, transformative equal-status mixed design, balanced transformative mixed methods | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | The equal-weight transformative mixed methods design combines quantitative and qualitative strands at equal priority (QUAN + QUAL) within an overarching transformative theoretical framework — such as feminist, critical race, disability rights, or social justice theory. Both data types carry equivalent evidential weight, and the entire study is structured to challenge inequity, give voice to marginalized groups, and generate findings oriented toward advocacy and social change. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|