ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Динамичен анализ на модулността×Откриване на общности×
ОбластМрежови анализМрежови анализ
СемействоMachine learningProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20102002–2019 (algorithm family)
СъздателMucha, P. J.; Porter, M. A.; and colleaguesLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
ТипCommunity detection on temporal networksGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
Основополагащ източникMucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328(5980), 876–878. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
Други названияdynamic community structure analysis, temporal modularity optimization, evolving community detection, time-varying modularitygraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
Свързани55
РезюмеDynamic modularity analysis extends the classical modularity framework to networks that evolve over time, detecting communities across a sequence of network snapshots while penalizing unnecessary community changes between time steps. It identifies cohesive groups and tracks how they form, merge, split, or dissolve, giving researchers a principled view of structural change in longitudinal network data.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Dynamic Modularity Analysis · Community Detection. Извлечено на 2026-06-15 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare