Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Събиране на документи× | Дискурсивен анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област≠ | Методология на проучванията | Качествени изследвания |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Създател≠ | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique | Method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Свързани≠ | 3 | 2 |
| Резюме≠ | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|