Сравнение на методи

	Оценка на програми, базирана на документи	Историческо архивно изследване
Област	Полеви методи	Полеви методи
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s	19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s)
Създател	Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition)	Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century
Тип	Evaluation research design	Qualitative primary-source research
Основополагащ източник	Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331	Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853
Други названия	documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation	archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research
Свързани	6	6
Резюме	Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible.	Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines.