ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Discourse Completion Task×Съдържателен анализ×Matched-Guise Technique×
ОбластЛингвистикаКачествени методиЛингвистика
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1989Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181960
СъздателShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (CCSARP project)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchWallace Lambert and colleagues
ТипWritten/oral elicitation instrument for speech-act dataQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueIndirect experimental measure of language attitudes
Основополагащ източникBlum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing. ISBN: 9780893915131Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗
Други названияDiscourse Completion Test, DCT, Production Questionnaireİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisMatched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched Guise
Свързани352
РезюмеThe discourse completion task (DCT) is an elicitation instrument widely used in pragmatics to gather data on how people perform speech acts such as requests, apologies, refusals, and compliments. Respondents read short descriptions of situations and write (or say) what they would utter in each, allowing researchers to collect comparable speech-act data across many speakers, languages, and cultures under controlled conditions. It was popularized by the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) of Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper in 1989.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Discourse Completion Task · Content Analysis · Matched-Guise Technique. Извлечено на 2026-06-25 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare