Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Дигитален рефлексивен тематичен анализ× | Рефлексивен тематичен анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2006 (RTA foundation); digital application consolidated ~2019–2022 | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| Създател≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (reflexive foundation); extended by digital qualitative researchers | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | digital RTA, online reflexive thematic analysis, RTA for digital data | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Digital Reflexive Thematic Analysis (Digital RTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to qualitative data generated in or collected from digital environments — including social media posts, online forums, chat transcripts, email, digital interviews, and other online texts. It foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role and treats theme generation as a creative-analytic act shaped by the analyst's theoretical positioning rather than a mechanical coding procedure. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|