ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Digital Methods×Controversy Mapping×
ОбластScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20132010
СъздателRichard Rogers, Amsterdam Digital Methods InitiativeBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
ТипEmpirical research approach for online dataQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
Основополагащ източникRogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018838Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
Други названияFollow the medium, Natively digital research, Web epistemology methodsCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Свързани44
РезюмеDigital methods is an empirical research approach, developed by Richard Rogers and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative, that takes the methods of online platforms and devices—the link, the like, the hashtag, the search engine ranking—and repurposes them for social and cultural research. Its guiding maxim is to 'follow the medium': rather than importing offline methods like the survey onto the web, the analyst learns what the medium already counts, ranks, and recommends, and turns those native operations into research instruments.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Digital Methods · Controversy Mapping. Извлечено на 2026-06-24 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare